The B2B Marketing Effectiveness Benchmark Survey 2026

Measuring the Gap Between Confidence and Results in B2B Marketing

265+ B2B marketers reveal where confidence ends, where capability gaps begin, and what high performers do differently.

269
Respondents
6+
Industries
5
Regions
5
Company sizes
Download the report
Marketing Effectiveness

Are you in the top 36%? Most B2B marketers are not hitting 9/10 effectiveness.

When it comes to delivering key business outcomes, only 13% of respondents gave themselves a perfect 10 out of 10. Marketing is generally seen as delivering, but few feel confident enough to claim outstanding results.

While 36% rate their effectiveness at the highest levels (9 or 10 out of 10), the majority (64%) rate themselves 8 or below – performing, but not pulling ahead.

High Performers:
36%
All Others:
64%
All Industries · n=269
Marketing Effectiveness

Just 33% of Professional Services marketers consistently rate their marketing at the highest levels.

In Professional Services, 33% rate their effectiveness at the highest levels – broadly in line with the 36% all-industry average.

13% gave themselves a perfect 10, while the majority (67%) rate themselves 8 or below – performing, but with room to push further.

High Performers:
33%
All Others:
67%
Professional Services · n=79
Marketing Effectiveness

41% of Financial Services marketers rate their marketing effectiveness at the highest levels.

Financial Services sits slightly above average, with 41% rating their effectiveness at the highest levels (9 or 10) compared to the 36% all-industry benchmark – suggesting solid execution overall.

10% gave themselves a perfect 10, while 59% rate themselves 8 or below – a majority, though a smaller one than seen across most other sectors.

High Performers:
41%
All Others:
59%
Financial Services · n=29
Marketing Effectiveness

Just 33% of Manufacturing / Industrial marketers consistently rate their marketing at the highest levels.

In Manufacturing / Industrial, 33% rate their effectiveness at the highest levels – broadly in line with the 36% all-industry average.

13% gave themselves a perfect 10, while the majority (67%) rate themselves 8 or below – consistent with the wider industry picture.

High Performers:
33%
All Others:
67%
Manufacturing / Industrial · n=70
Marketing Effectiveness

More than half of Technology / SaaS marketers rate their marketing effectiveness at the highest levels.

Technology / SaaS stands out for marketing effectiveness – over half (55%) rate their performance at the highest levels (9-10 ratings), well above the all-industry average of 36%.

25% gave themselves a perfect 10 – the highest rate across all industries – while 45% rate themselves 8 or below, a notably smaller proportion than the average.

High Performers:
55%
All Others:
45%
Technology / SaaS · n=53
Marketing Effectiveness

Just 27% of Healthcare / Life Sciences marketers consistently rate their marketing at the highest levels.

Healthcare / Life Sciences falls below the average, with just 27% rating their effectiveness at the highest levels (9-10 ratings) against a 36% all-industry benchmark.

No respondent gave themselves a perfect 10 – the only sector where this is the case – and the vast majority (73%) rate themselves 8 or below, pointing to significant room for improvement.

High Performers:
27%
All Others:
73%
Healthcare / Life Sciences · n=15
Marketing Effectiveness

Only 17% of Other Industries are hitting top-tier marketing effectiveness.

Other Industries records the lowest top-tier effectiveness of any segment, with just 17% rating themselves at the highest levels – well below the 36% all-industry average.

Only 4% gave themselves a perfect 10, and the large majority (83%) rate themselves 8 or below – suggesting acknowledged room for improvement across the board.

High Performers:
17%
All Others:
83%
Other Industries · n=23
Analytical Benchmarks

Compare your performance against the benchmark.

Data validated across 265+ B2B decision makers highlights clear separation between high-performing teams and the rest. Explore where confidence begins to break down across three critical areas. Filters persist across all views.

Measurement & ROI

Nearly half of marketing teams cannot prove their revenue impact. Can you?

While 90% of B2B marketers are confident their brand creates preference among buyers, 42% are unable to clearly demonstrate its impact on business outcomes.

90%

Confident in brand

VS

42%

Unable to demonstrate impact

All Industries · n=269
Targeting & Data

You know who to target, but do you know how to reach them?

92% of B2B marketers are confident their ICP reflects their best-fit customers. Nevertheless, 34% still struggle to find and reach those buyers effectively.

Confident in ICP:
92%
Struggle to reach buyers:
34%
All Industries · n=269
Budget & Strategy

Is your 2026 budget backing the right bets? Most marketers are not sure.

Just 47% of B2B marketing teams express high confidence their budget is allocated correctly – the majority (53%) are less certain.

47%

Highly confident in budget priorities

All Industries · n=269
Measurement & ROI

High performers are far better at proving brand impact. See how the gap breaks down.

While confidence levels differ somewhat, 53% of all others struggle to prove impact versus 22% of high performers – measurement capability is where they pull ahead.

High Performers

Confident their brand builds preference:
97%
Unable to demonstrate brand impact:
22%

All Others

Confident their brand builds preference:
87%
Unable to demonstrate brand impact:
53%
All Industries · High n=98 · All Others n=171
Targeting & Data

ICP confidence is near-universal. Reaching those buyers is where the gap opens up.

ICP confidence differs more (97% vs 89%) than reach effectiveness – high performers know their targets better, but reaching them remains challenging.

High Performers

Confident in ICP:
97%
Struggle to reach buyers:
38%

All Others

Confident in ICP:
89%
Struggle to reach buyers:
32%
All Industries · High n=98 · All Others n=171
Budget & Strategy

Budget confidence separates high performers more starkly than almost any other metric.

Very high budget confidence separates high performers (76%) from all others (31%) more starkly than almost any other measure.

High Performers

76%

Highly confident in budget priorities

All Others

31%

Highly confident in budget priorities

All Industries · High n=98 · All Others n=171
Measurement & ROI

Nearly half of Professional Services teams cannot prove their revenue impact.

89% of Professional Services teams are confident their brand creates preference among buyers, yet 42% are unable to clearly demonstrate its impact on revenue.

89%

Confident in brand

-1pp avg

VS

42%

Unable to demonstrate impact

Professional Services · n=79
Targeting & Data

ICP confidence is strong across Professional Services teams – but effective reach remains a challenge.

While 89% of Professional Services teams are confident their ICP reflects their best-fit customers, 37% still struggle to find and reach those buyers effectively.

Confident in ICP:
89%
-3pp avg
Struggle to reach buyers:
37%
+3pp avg
Professional Services · n=79
Budget & Strategy

Under a third of Professional Services teams are confident in their 2026 budget allocation.

Only 44% of Professional Services teams express high confidence their budget is allocated correctly, leaving 56% less certain.

44%

highly confident in budget priorities

-3pp avg
Professional Services · n=79
Measurement & ROI

The proof gap across Professional Services teams – high performers have a clear advantage.

Just 27% of high performers in Professional Services teams struggle to prove brand impact, compared to 49% of all others – a clear capability advantage.

High Performers

Confident their brand builds preference:
92%
Unable to demonstrate brand impact:
27%

All Others

Confident their brand builds preference:
87%
Unable to demonstrate brand impact:
49%
Professional Services · High n=26 · All Others n=53
Targeting & Data

ICP confidence and reach effectiveness in Professional Services teams – how the two groups compare.

ICP confidence is similar in Professional Services teams, but 32% of all others struggle to reach buyers versus 46% of high performers – knowing your target doesn't guarantee finding them.

High Performers

Confident in ICP:
92%
Struggle to reach buyers:
46%

All Others

Confident in ICP:
86%
Struggle to reach buyers:
32%
Professional Services · High n=26 · All Others n=53
Budget & Strategy

Budget confidence in Professional Services teams is strongly split – high performers are far more assured.

In Professional Services teams, 73% of high performers express high confidence in their budget priorities, compared to just 30% of all others.

High Performers

73%

Highly confident in budget priorities

All Others

30%

Highly confident in budget priorities

Professional Services · High n=26 · All Others n=53
Measurement & ROI

Nearly half of Financial Services teams cannot prove their revenue impact.

96% of Financial Services teams are confident their brand creates preference among buyers, yet 48% are unable to clearly demonstrate its impact on revenue.

96%

 Confident in brand

+6pp avg

VS

48%

Unable to demonstrate impact

+6pp avg
Financial Services · n=29
Targeting & Data

ICP confidence is strong across Financial Services teams – but effective reach remains a challenge.

While 93% of Financial Services teams are confident their ICP reflects their best-fit customers, 28% still struggle to find and reach those buyers effectively.

Confident in ICP:
93%
+1pp avg
Struggle to reach buyers:
28%
-6pp avg
Financial Services · n=29
Budget & Strategy

Most of Financial Services teams have doubts about their 2026 budget allocation.

52% of Financial Services teams express high confidence in their budget priorities – a slim majority, with 48% less certain.

52%

Highly confident in budget priorities

+5pp avg
Financial Services · n=29
Measurement & ROI

The proof gap is stark in Financial Services teams – high performers are far ahead.

Confidence levels are nearly identical in Financial Services teams, yet 71% of all others struggle to prove impact versus just 17% of high performers – proving impact, not belief, separates them.

High Performers

Confident their brand builds preference:
100%
Unable to demonstrate brand impact:
17%

All Others

Confident their brand builds preference:
94%
Unable to demonstrate brand impact:
71%
Financial Services · High n=12 · All Others n=17
Targeting & Data

ICP confidence and reach effectiveness in Financial Services teams – how the two groups compare.

The ICP confidence gap in Financial Services teams (100% vs 88%) exceeds the reach gap – high performers are clearer on targets, though that advantage only partly translates to finding them.

High Performers

Confident in ICP:
100%
Struggle to reach buyers:
25%

All Others

Confident in ICP:
88%
Struggle to reach buyers:
29%
Financial Services · High n=12 · All Others n=17
Budget & Strategy

Budget confidence in Financial Services teams is strongly split – high performers are far more assured.

In Financial Services teams, 83% of high performers express high confidence in their budget priorities – versus just 29% of all others. The gap is extreme.

High Performers

83%

Highly confident in budget priorities

All Others

29%

Highly confident in budget priorities

Financial Services · High n=12 · All Others n=17
Measurement & ROI

More than a third of Manufacturing / Industrial teams struggle to demonstrate brand impact.

93% of Manufacturing / Industrial teams are confident their brand creates preference among buyers, yet 34% are unable to clearly demonstrate its impact on revenue.

93%

Confident in brand

+3pp avg

VS

34%

Unable to demonstrate impact

-8pp avg
Manufacturing / Industrial · n=70
Targeting & Data

ICP confidence is high in Manufacturing / Industrial teams. Reaching those buyers is a different story.

While 93% of Manufacturing / Industrial teams are confident their ICP reflects their best-fit customers, 36% still struggle to find and reach those buyers effectively.

Confident in ICP:
93%
+1pp avg
Struggle to reach buyers:
36%
+2pp avg
Manufacturing / Industrial · n=70
Budget & Strategy

Most of Manufacturing / Industrial teams have doubts about their 2026 budget allocation.

Only 47% of Manufacturing / Industrial teams express high confidence their budget is allocated correctly, leaving 53% less certain.

47%

Highly confident in budget priorities

Manufacturing / Industrial · n=70
Measurement & ROI

The proof gap across Manufacturing / Industrial teams – high performers have a clear advantage.

Just 13% of high performers in Manufacturing / Industrial teams struggle to prove brand impact, compared to 44% of all others – a clear capability advantage.

High Performers

Confident their brand builds preference:
100%
Unable to demonstrate brand impact:
13%

All Others

Confident their brand builds preference:
89%
Unable to demonstrate brand impact:
44%
Manufacturing / Industrial · High n=23 · All Others n=47
Targeting & Data

ICP confidence and reach effectiveness in Manufacturing / Industrial teams – how the two groups compare.

ICP confidence is high across Manufacturing / Industrial teams (100% of high performers), yet 39% still struggle to reach target buyers – clarity and execution remain separate challenges.

High Performers

Confident in ICP:
100%
Struggle to reach buyers:
39%

All Others

Confident in ICP:
89%
Struggle to reach buyers:
34%
Manufacturing / Industrial · High n=23 · All Others n=47
Budget & Strategy

Budget confidence in Manufacturing / Industrial teams is strongly split – high performers are far more assured.

In Manufacturing / Industrial teams, 83% of high performers express high confidence in their budget priorities – versus just 30% of all others. The gap is extreme.

High Performers

83%

Highly confident in budget priorities

All Others

30%

Highly confident in budget priorities

Manufacturing / Industrial · High n=23 · All Others n=47
Measurement & ROI

More than a third of Technology / SaaS teams struggle to demonstrate brand impact.

85% of Technology / SaaS teams are confident their brand creates preference among buyers, yet 38% are unable to clearly demonstrate its impact on revenue.

85%

Confident in brand

-5pp avg

VS

38%

Unable to demonstrate impact

-4pp avg
Technology / SaaS · n=53
Targeting & Data

ICP confidence is high in Technology / SaaS teams. Reaching those buyers is a different story.

ICP confidence in Technology / SaaS teams is near-universal (98%), yet 40% still struggle to reach those buyers – a significant execution gap.

Confident in ICP:
98%
+6pp avg
Struggle to reach buyers:
40%
+6pp avg
Technology / SaaS · n=53
Budget & Strategy

Modest budget confidence in Technology / SaaS teams – more than most, but doubt remains.

60% of Technology / SaaS teams express high confidence in their budget priorities – a slim majority, with 40% less certain.

60%

Highly confident in budget priorities

+13pp avg
Technology / SaaS · n=53
Measurement & ROI

The proof gap is stark in Technology / SaaS teams – high performers are far ahead.

In Technology / SaaS teams, 59% of all others cannot demonstrate impact compared to 21% of high performers – high performers believe in their brand more and can back it up with data.

High Performers

Confident their brand builds preference:
97%
Unable to demonstrate brand impact:
21%

All Others

Confident their brand builds preference:
71%
Unable to demonstrate brand impact:
59%
Technology / SaaS · High n=29 · All Others n=24
Targeting & Data

ICP confidence and reach effectiveness in Technology / SaaS teams – how the two groups compare.

ICP confidence is similar in Technology / SaaS teams, but 46% of all others struggle to reach buyers versus 34% of high performers – knowing your target doesn't guarantee finding them.

High Performers

Confident in ICP:
100%
Struggle to reach buyers:
34%

All Others

Confident in ICP:
96%
Struggle to reach buyers:
46%
Technology / SaaS · High n=29 · All Others n=24
Budget & Strategy

Budget confidence across Technology / SaaS teams – a clear gap between the two groups.

In Technology / SaaS teams, 79% of high performers express high confidence in their budget priorities, compared to just 38% of all others.

High Performers

79%

Highly confident in budget priorities

All Others

38%

Highly confident in budget priorities

Technology / SaaS · High n=29 · All Others n=24
Measurement & ROI

More than half of Healthcare / Life Sciences teams cannot prove their brand impact.

While 93% of Healthcare / Life Sciences teams believe their brand drives preference, a majority (60%) cannot clearly demonstrate its business impact.

93%

Confident in brand

+3pp avg

VS

60%

Unable to demonstrate impact

+18pp avg
Healthcare / Life Sciences · n=15
Targeting & Data

ICP confidence is strong across Healthcare / Life Sciences teams – but effective reach remains a challenge.

93% of Healthcare / Life Sciences teams are confident in their ICP, and most are reaching them effectively – only 13% report struggles.

Confident in ICP:
93%
+1pp avg
Struggle to reach buyers:
13%
-21pp avg
Healthcare / Life Sciences · n=15
Budget & Strategy

Budget confidence is very low in Healthcare / Life Sciences teams.

Just 20% of Healthcare / Life Sciences teams express high confidence in their budget priorities – the majority (80%) are less certain.

20%

Highly confident in budget priorities

-27pp avg
Healthcare / Life Sciences · n=15
Measurement & ROI

The proof gap across Healthcare / Life Sciences teams – high performers have a clear advantage.

The proof gap in Healthcare / Life Sciences teams is modest (50% vs 64%) – both groups face similar challenges translating brand belief into measurable outcomes.

High Performers

Confident their brand builds preference:
100%
Unable to demonstrate brand impact:
50%

All Others

Confident their brand builds preference:
91%
Unable to demonstrate brand impact:
64%
Healthcare / Life Sciences · High n=4 · All Others n=11
Targeting & Data

ICP confidence and reach effectiveness in Healthcare / Life Sciences teams – how the two groups compare.

In Healthcare / Life Sciences teams, 25% of high performers struggle to reach buyers versus 9% of all others – an unusual reversal where high performers face more challenges.

High Performers

Confident in ICP:
100%
Struggle to reach buyers:
25%

All Others

Confident in ICP:
91%
Struggle to reach buyers:
9%
Healthcare / Life Sciences · High n=4 · All Others n=11
Budget & Strategy

Budget confidence across Healthcare / Life Sciences teams – a clear gap between the two groups.

Very high budget confidence in Healthcare / Life Sciences teams strongly separates high performers (50%) from all others (9%).

High Performers

50%

Highly confident in budget priorities

All Others

9%

Highly confident in budget priorities

Healthcare / Life Sciences · High n=4 · All Others n=11
Measurement & ROI

More than half of teams in this group cannot prove their brand impact.

92% of teams in this group are confident their brand creates preference among buyers, yet 57% are unable to clearly demonstrate its impact on revenue.

92%

 Confident in brand

+2pp avg

VS

57%

Unable to demonstrate impact

+15pp avg
Other · n=23
Targeting & Data

ICP confidence is strong across teams in this group – but effective reach remains a challenge.

While 87% of teams in this group are confident their ICP reflects their best-fit customers, 30% still struggle to find and reach those buyers effectively.

Confident in ICP:
87%
-5pp avg
Struggle to reach buyers:
30%
-4pp avg
Other · n=23
Budget & Strategy

More than a third of teams in this group are confident in their 2026 budget allocation.

Only 39% of teams in this group express high confidence their budget is allocated correctly, leaving 61% less certain.

39%

Highly confident in budget priorities

-8pp avg
Other · n=23
Measurement & ROI

The proof gap across teams in this group – high performers have a clear advantage.

The proof gap in teams in this group is modest (50% vs 58%) – both groups face similar challenges translating brand belief into measurable outcomes.

High Performers

Confident their brand builds preference:
100%
Unable to demonstrate brand impact:
50%

All Others

Confident their brand builds preference:
89%
Unable to demonstrate brand impact:
58%
Other Industries · High n=4 · All Others n=19
Targeting & Data

ICP confidence and reach effectiveness in teams in this group – how the two groups compare.

In teams in this group, ICP confidence is higher among high performers (100% vs 84%), but they paradoxically struggle more with reach (50% vs 26%) – an unusual pattern.

High Performers

Confident in ICP:
100%
Struggle to reach buyers:
50%

All Others

Confident in ICP:
84%
Struggle to reach buyers:
26%
Other Industries · High n=4 · All Others n=19
Budget & Strategy

Budget confidence across teams in this group – a clear gap between the two groups.

Budget confidence in teams in this group shows an unusual pattern – 42% of all others are highly confident versus 25% of high performers, the smallest gap across industries.

High Performers

25%

Highly confident in budget priorities

All Others

42%

Highly confident in budget priorities

Other Industries · High n=4 · All Others n=19
Download the full benchmark report

See exactly where high performers pull ahead.

The difference between marketing that meets objectives and marketing that consistently exceeds them is not luck – it is specific, repeatable practices.

Our benchmark report reveals how the top 36% approach targeting, prove brand impact, quantify revenue contribution, and allocate budgets with confidence.

Based on data from 265+ B2B marketing leaders, you will see where capability gaps emerge, why most teams get stuck at "good enough," and what it takes to break through.

Marketing Effectiveness in 2026

The drivers of marketing effectiveness.

We asked 265+ B2B marketers which changes would have the greatest impact on their results. Tile size reflects the proportion selecting each priority. Use the filters to compare responses by performance tier and industry – and see how priorities shift between high-performing teams and the rest.

33%

Stronger creative & content

Stronger creative & content
:
33%

32%

Greater sales-marketing alignment

Greater sales-marketing alignment
:
32%

30%

More investment in brand

More investment in brand
:
30%

29%

Better technology / martech

Better technology / martech
:
29%

27%

Enhanced customer experience

Enhanced customer experience
:
27%

26%

Larger budget

Larger budget
:
26%

25%

Better audience data & insight

Better audience data & insight
:
25%

21%

Improved measurement & attribution

Improved measurement & attribution
:
21%

20%

Additional team capacity

Additional team capacity
:
20%

14%

External strategic support

External strategic support
:
14%
All Industries · n=269

35%

Stronger creative & content

Stronger creative & content
:
35%

34%

Better technology / martech

Better technology / martech
:
34%

33%

More investment in brand

More investment in brand
:
33%

30%

Better audience data & insight

Better audience data & insight
:
30%

30%

Greater sales-marketing alignment

Greater sales-marketing alignment
:
30%

29%

Enhanced customer experience

Enhanced customer experience
:
29%

23%

Improved measurement & attribution

Improved measurement & attribution
:
23%

22%

Larger budget

Larger budget
:
22%

19%

Additional team capacity

Additional team capacity
:
19%

15%

External strategic support

External strategic support
:
15%
High Performers · All Industries · n=98

33%

Greater sales-marketing alignment

Greater sales-marketing alignment
:
33%

32%

Stronger creative & content

Stronger creative & content
:
32%

29%

More investment in brand

More investment in brand
:
29%

28%

Larger budget

Larger budget
:
28%

26%

Enhanced customer experience

Enhanced customer experience
:
26%

26%

Better technology / martech

Better technology / martech
:
26%

23%

Better audience data & insight

Better audience data & insight
:
23%

20%

Improved measurement & attribution

Improved measurement & attribution
:
20%

20%

Additional team capacity

Additional team capacity
:
20%

13%

External strategic support

External strategic support
:
13%
All Others · All Industries · n=171

35%

Stronger creative & content

Stronger creative & content
:
35%

33%

Better technology / martech

Better technology / martech
:
33%

30%

Greater sales-marketing alignment

Greater sales-marketing alignment
:
30%

27%

Larger budget

Larger budget
:
27%

25%

More investment in brand

More investment in brand
:
25%

23%

Better audience data & insight

Better audience data & insight
:
23%

23%

Additional team capacity

Additional team capacity
:
23%

20%

Improved measurement & attribution

Improved measurement & attribution
:
20%

18%

Enhanced customer experience

Enhanced customer experience
:
18%

18%

External strategic support

External strategic support
:
18%
Professional Services · n=79

46%

Stronger creative & content

Stronger creative & content
:
46%

38%

Better technology / martech

Better technology / martech
:
38%

35%

Greater sales-marketing alignment

Greater sales-marketing alignment
:
35%

31%

Better audience data & insight

Better audience data & insight
:
31%

31%

More investment in brand

More investment in brand
:
31%

23%

Improved measurement & attribution

Improved measurement & attribution
:
23%

23%

Larger budget

Larger budget
:
23%

19%

Additional team capacity

Additional team capacity
:
19%

19%

External strategic support

External strategic support
:
19%

15%

Enhanced customer experience

Enhanced customer experience
:
15%
High Performers · Professional Services · n=26

30%

Stronger creative & content

Stronger creative & content
:
30%

30%

Better technology / martech

Better technology / martech
:
30%

28%

Greater sales-marketing alignment

Greater sales-marketing alignment
:
28%

28%

Larger budget

Larger budget
:
28%

25%

Additional team capacity

Additional team capacity
:
25%

23%

More investment in brand

More investment in brand
:
23%

19%

Better audience data & insight

Better audience data & insight
:
19%

19%

Improved measurement & attribution

Improved measurement & attribution
:
19%

19%

Enhanced customer experience

Enhanced customer experience
:
19%

17%

External strategic support

External strategic support
:
17%
All Others · Professional Services · n=53

38%

Greater sales-marketing alignment

Greater sales-marketing alignment
:
38%

34%

More investment in brand

More investment in brand
:
34%

34%

Larger budget

Larger budget
:
34%

28%

External strategic support

External strategic support
:
28%

24%

Better audience data & insight

Better audience data & insight
:
24%

24%

Enhanced customer experience

Enhanced customer experience
:
24%

21%

Stronger creative & content

Stronger creative & content
:
21%

17%

Better technology / martech

Better technology / martech
:
17%

14%

Improved measurement & attribution

Improved measurement & attribution
:
14%

14%

Additional team capacity

Additional team capacity
:
14%
Financial Services · n=29

50%

More investment in brand

More investment in brand
:
50%

42%

Stronger creative & content

Stronger creative & content
:
42%

42%

Enhanced customer experience

Enhanced customer experience
:
42%

33%

Better audience data & insight

Better audience data & insight
:
33%

33%

Greater sales-marketing alignment

Greater sales-marketing alignment
:
33%

33%

Larger budget

Larger budget
:
33%

25%

External strategic support

External strategic support
:
25%

17%

Better technology / martech

Better technology / martech
:
17%

8%

Additional team capacity

Additional team capacity
:
8%
High Performers · Financial Services · n=12

41%

Greater sales-marketing alignment

Greater sales-marketing alignment
:
41%

35%

Larger budget

Larger budget
:
35%

29%

External strategic support

External strategic support
:
29%

24%

Improved measurement & attribution

Improved measurement & attribution
:
24%

24%

More investment in brand

More investment in brand
:
24%

18%

Better audience data & insight

Better audience data & insight
:
18%

18%

Better technology / martech

Better technology / martech
:
18%

18%

Additional team capacity

Additional team capacity
:
18%

12%

Enhanced customer experience

Enhanced customer experience
:
12%

6%

Stronger creative & content

Stronger creative & content
:
6%
All Others · Financial Services · n=17

43%

More investment in brand

More investment in brand
:
43%

36%

Better technology / martech

Better technology / martech
:
36%

36%

Stronger creative & content

Stronger creative & content
:
36%

33%

Enhanced customer experience

Enhanced customer experience
:
33%

30%

Better audience data & insight

Better audience data & insight
:
30%

27%

Greater sales-marketing alignment

Greater sales-marketing alignment
:
27%

23%

Larger budget

Larger budget
:
23%

20%

Improved measurement & attribution

Improved measurement & attribution
:
20%

16%

Additional team capacity

Additional team capacity
:
16%

6%

External strategic support

External strategic support
:
6%
Manufacturing / Industrial · n=70

100%

Better technology / martech

Better technology / martech
:
100%

92%

More investment in brand

More investment in brand
:
92%

83%

Enhanced customer experience

Enhanced customer experience
:
83%

75%

Better audience data & insight

Better audience data & insight
:
75%

58%

Improved measurement & attribution

Improved measurement & attribution
:
58%

50%

Stronger creative & content

Stronger creative & content
:
50%

42%

Greater sales-marketing alignment

Greater sales-marketing alignment
:
42%

8%

Larger budget

Larger budget
:
8%

8%

Additional team capacity

Additional team capacity
:
8%

8%

External strategic support

External strategic support
:
8%
High Performers · Manufacturing / Industrial · n=23

40%

More investment in brand

More investment in brand
:
40%

40%

Stronger creative & content

Stronger creative & content
:
40%

32%

Larger budget

Larger budget
:
32%

30%

Greater sales-marketing alignment

Greater sales-marketing alignment
:
30%

28%

Better technology / martech

Better technology / martech
:
28%

28%

Enhanced customer experience

Enhanced customer experience
:
28%

26%

Better audience data & insight

Better audience data & insight
:
26%

21%

Additional team capacity

Additional team capacity
:
21%

15%

Improved measurement & attribution

Improved measurement & attribution
:
15%

6%

External strategic support

External strategic support
:
6%
All Others · Manufacturing / Industrial · n=47

40%

Greater sales-marketing alignment

Greater sales-marketing alignment
:
40%

32%

Stronger creative & content

Stronger creative & content
:
32%

26%

Improved measurement & attribution

Improved measurement & attribution
:
26%

26%

Enhanced customer experience

Enhanced customer experience
:
26%

26%

Better technology / martech

Better technology / martech
:
26%

26%

Larger budget

Larger budget
:
26%

25%

Better audience data & insight

Better audience data & insight
:
25%

25%

More investment in brand

More investment in brand
:
25%

19%

Additional team capacity

Additional team capacity
:
19%

15%

External strategic support

External strategic support
:
15%
Technology / SaaS · n=53

34%

Larger budget

Larger budget
:
34%

31%

Stronger creative & content

Stronger creative & content
:
31%

31%

Improved measurement & attribution

Improved measurement & attribution
:
31%

28%

Greater sales-marketing alignment

Greater sales-marketing alignment
:
28%

28%

Additional team capacity

Additional team capacity
:
28%

24%

Better audience data & insight

Better audience data & insight
:
24%

21%

Enhanced customer experience

Enhanced customer experience
:
21%

21%

More investment in brand

More investment in brand
:
21%

21%

Better technology / martech

Better technology / martech
:
21%

17%

External strategic support

External strategic support
:
17%
High Performers · Technology / SaaS · n=29

54%

Greater sales-marketing alignment

Greater sales-marketing alignment
:
54%

33%

Stronger creative & content

Stronger creative & content
:
33%

33%

Enhanced customer experience

Enhanced customer experience
:
33%

33%

Better technology / martech

Better technology / martech
:
33%

29%

More investment in brand

More investment in brand
:
29%

25%

Better audience data & insight

Better audience data & insight
:
25%

21%

Improved measurement & attribution

Improved measurement & attribution
:
21%

17%

Larger budget

Larger budget
:
17%

13%

External strategic support

External strategic support
:
13%

8%

Additional team capacity

Additional team capacity
:
8%
All Others · Technology / SaaS · n=24

40%

Enhanced customer experience

Enhanced customer experience
:
40%

40%

Additional team capacity

Additional team capacity
:
40%

33%

Larger budget

Larger budget
:
33%

27%

Stronger creative & content

Stronger creative & content
:
27%

27%

Improved measurement & attribution

Improved measurement & attribution
:
27%

20%

More investment in brand

More investment in brand
:
20%

20%

Better technology / martech

Better technology / martech
:
20%

20%

External strategic support

External strategic support
:
20%

7%

Greater sales-marketing alignment

Greater sales-marketing alignment
:
7%

7%

Better audience data & insight

Better audience data & insight
:
7%
Healthcare / Life Sciences · n=15

75%

Enhanced customer experience

Enhanced customer experience
:
75%

75%

Additional team capacity

Additional team capacity
:
75%

25%

Stronger creative & content

Stronger creative & content
:
25%

25%

Improved measurement & attribution

Improved measurement & attribution
:
25%

25%

More investment in brand

More investment in brand
:
25%

25%

Better technology / martech

Better technology / martech
:
25%

25%

External strategic support

External strategic support
:
25%
High Performers · Healthcare / Life Sciences · n=4

45%

Larger budget

Larger budget
:
45%

27%

Stronger creative & content

Stronger creative & content
:
27%

27%

Improved measurement & attribution

Improved measurement & attribution
:
27%

27%

Enhanced customer experience

Enhanced customer experience
:
27%

27%

Additional team capacity

Additional team capacity
:
27%

18%

More investment in brand

More investment in brand
:
18%

18%

Better technology / martech

Better technology / martech
:
18%

18%

External strategic support

External strategic support
:
18%

9%

Greater sales-marketing alignment

Greater sales-marketing alignment
:
9%

9%

Better audience data & insight

Better audience data & insight
:
9%
All Others · Healthcare / Life Sciences · n=11

43%

Greater sales-marketing alignment

Greater sales-marketing alignment
:
43%

39%

Enhanced customer experience

Enhanced customer experience
:
39%

35%

Better audience data & insight

Better audience data & insight
:
35%

35%

Stronger creative & content

Stronger creative & content
:
35%

22%

Improved measurement & attribution

Improved measurement & attribution
:
22%

22%

More investment in brand

More investment in brand
:
22%

17%

Better technology / martech

Better technology / martech
:
17%

17%

Additional team capacity

Additional team capacity
:
17%

17%

Larger budget

Larger budget
:
17%

4%

External strategic support

External strategic support
:
4%
Other Industries · n=23

75%

Greater sales-marketing alignment

Greater sales-marketing alignment
:
75%

50%

Better technology / martech

Better technology / martech
:
50%

25%

Better audience data & insight

Better audience data & insight
:
25%

25%

Stronger creative & content

Stronger creative & content
:
25%

25%

Additional team capacity

Additional team capacity
:
25%

25%

Larger budget

Larger budget
:
25%
High Performers · Other Industries · n=4

47%

Enhanced customer experience

Enhanced customer experience
:
47%

37%

Better audience data & insight

Better audience data & insight
:
37%

37%

Stronger creative & content

Stronger creative & content
:
37%

37%

Greater sales-marketing alignment

Greater sales-marketing alignment
:
37%

26%

Improved measurement & attribution

Improved measurement & attribution
:
26%

26%

More investment in brand

More investment in brand
:
26%

16%

Additional team capacity

Additional team capacity
:
16%

16%

Larger budget

Larger budget
:
16%

11%

Better technology / martech

Better technology / martech
:
11%

5%

External strategic support

External strategic support
:
5%
All Others · Other Industries · n=19