265+ B2B marketers reveal where confidence ends, where capability gaps begin, and what high performers do differently.
When it comes to delivering key business outcomes, only 13% of respondents gave themselves a perfect 10 out of 10. Marketing is generally seen as delivering, but few feel confident enough to claim outstanding results.
While 36% rate their effectiveness at the highest levels (9 or 10 out of 10), the majority (64%) rate themselves 8 or below – performing, but not pulling ahead.
In Professional Services, 33% rate their effectiveness at the highest levels – broadly in line with the 36% all-industry average.
13% gave themselves a perfect 10, while the majority (67%) rate themselves 8 or below – performing, but with room to push further.
Financial Services sits slightly above average, with 41% rating their effectiveness at the highest levels (9 or 10) compared to the 36% all-industry benchmark – suggesting solid execution overall.
10% gave themselves a perfect 10, while 59% rate themselves 8 or below – a majority, though a smaller one than seen across most other sectors.
In Manufacturing / Industrial, 33% rate their effectiveness at the highest levels – broadly in line with the 36% all-industry average.
13% gave themselves a perfect 10, while the majority (67%) rate themselves 8 or below – consistent with the wider industry picture.
Technology / SaaS stands out for marketing effectiveness – over half (55%) rate their performance at the highest levels (9-10 ratings), well above the all-industry average of 36%.
25% gave themselves a perfect 10 – the highest rate across all industries – while 45% rate themselves 8 or below, a notably smaller proportion than the average.
Healthcare / Life Sciences falls below the average, with just 27% rating their effectiveness at the highest levels (9-10 ratings) against a 36% all-industry benchmark.
No respondent gave themselves a perfect 10 – the only sector where this is the case – and the vast majority (73%) rate themselves 8 or below, pointing to significant room for improvement.
Other Industries records the lowest top-tier effectiveness of any segment, with just 17% rating themselves at the highest levels – well below the 36% all-industry average.
Only 4% gave themselves a perfect 10, and the large majority (83%) rate themselves 8 or below – suggesting acknowledged room for improvement across the board.
Data validated across 265+ B2B decision makers highlights clear separation between high-performing teams and the rest. Explore where confidence begins to break down across three critical areas. Filters persist across all views.
While 90% of B2B marketers are confident their brand creates preference among buyers, 42% are unable to clearly demonstrate its impact on business outcomes.
Confident in brand
Unable to demonstrate impact
92% of B2B marketers are confident their ICP reflects their best-fit customers. Nevertheless, 34% still struggle to find and reach those buyers effectively.
Just 47% of B2B marketing teams express high confidence their budget is allocated correctly – the majority (53%) are less certain.
Highly confident in budget priorities
While confidence levels differ somewhat, 53% of all others struggle to prove impact versus 22% of high performers – measurement capability is where they pull ahead.
High Performers
All Others
ICP confidence differs more (97% vs 89%) than reach effectiveness – high performers know their targets better, but reaching them remains challenging.
High Performers
All Others
Very high budget confidence separates high performers (76%) from all others (31%) more starkly than almost any other measure.
High Performers
Highly confident in budget priorities
All Others
Highly confident in budget priorities
89% of Professional Services teams are confident their brand creates preference among buyers, yet 42% are unable to clearly demonstrate its impact on revenue.
Confident in brand
Unable to demonstrate impact
While 89% of Professional Services teams are confident their ICP reflects their best-fit customers, 37% still struggle to find and reach those buyers effectively.
Only 44% of Professional Services teams express high confidence their budget is allocated correctly, leaving 56% less certain.
highly confident in budget priorities
Just 27% of high performers in Professional Services teams struggle to prove brand impact, compared to 49% of all others – a clear capability advantage.
High Performers
All Others
ICP confidence is similar in Professional Services teams, but 32% of all others struggle to reach buyers versus 46% of high performers – knowing your target doesn't guarantee finding them.
High Performers
All Others
In Professional Services teams, 73% of high performers express high confidence in their budget priorities, compared to just 30% of all others.
High Performers
Highly confident in budget priorities
All Others
Highly confident in budget priorities
96% of Financial Services teams are confident their brand creates preference among buyers, yet 48% are unable to clearly demonstrate its impact on revenue.
Confident in brand
Unable to demonstrate impact
While 93% of Financial Services teams are confident their ICP reflects their best-fit customers, 28% still struggle to find and reach those buyers effectively.
52% of Financial Services teams express high confidence in their budget priorities – a slim majority, with 48% less certain.
Highly confident in budget priorities
Confidence levels are nearly identical in Financial Services teams, yet 71% of all others struggle to prove impact versus just 17% of high performers – proving impact, not belief, separates them.
High Performers
All Others
The ICP confidence gap in Financial Services teams (100% vs 88%) exceeds the reach gap – high performers are clearer on targets, though that advantage only partly translates to finding them.
High Performers
All Others
In Financial Services teams, 83% of high performers express high confidence in their budget priorities – versus just 29% of all others. The gap is extreme.
High Performers
Highly confident in budget priorities
All Others
Highly confident in budget priorities
93% of Manufacturing / Industrial teams are confident their brand creates preference among buyers, yet 34% are unable to clearly demonstrate its impact on revenue.
Confident in brand
Unable to demonstrate impact
While 93% of Manufacturing / Industrial teams are confident their ICP reflects their best-fit customers, 36% still struggle to find and reach those buyers effectively.
Only 47% of Manufacturing / Industrial teams express high confidence their budget is allocated correctly, leaving 53% less certain.
Highly confident in budget priorities
Just 13% of high performers in Manufacturing / Industrial teams struggle to prove brand impact, compared to 44% of all others – a clear capability advantage.
High Performers
All Others
ICP confidence is high across Manufacturing / Industrial teams (100% of high performers), yet 39% still struggle to reach target buyers – clarity and execution remain separate challenges.
High Performers
All Others
In Manufacturing / Industrial teams, 83% of high performers express high confidence in their budget priorities – versus just 30% of all others. The gap is extreme.
High Performers
Highly confident in budget priorities
All Others
Highly confident in budget priorities
85% of Technology / SaaS teams are confident their brand creates preference among buyers, yet 38% are unable to clearly demonstrate its impact on revenue.
Confident in brand
Unable to demonstrate impact
ICP confidence in Technology / SaaS teams is near-universal (98%), yet 40% still struggle to reach those buyers – a significant execution gap.
60% of Technology / SaaS teams express high confidence in their budget priorities – a slim majority, with 40% less certain.
Highly confident in budget priorities
In Technology / SaaS teams, 59% of all others cannot demonstrate impact compared to 21% of high performers – high performers believe in their brand more and can back it up with data.
High Performers
All Others
ICP confidence is similar in Technology / SaaS teams, but 46% of all others struggle to reach buyers versus 34% of high performers – knowing your target doesn't guarantee finding them.
High Performers
All Others
In Technology / SaaS teams, 79% of high performers express high confidence in their budget priorities, compared to just 38% of all others.
High Performers
Highly confident in budget priorities
All Others
Highly confident in budget priorities
While 93% of Healthcare / Life Sciences teams believe their brand drives preference, a majority (60%) cannot clearly demonstrate its business impact.
Confident in brand
Unable to demonstrate impact
93% of Healthcare / Life Sciences teams are confident in their ICP, and most are reaching them effectively – only 13% report struggles.
Just 20% of Healthcare / Life Sciences teams express high confidence in their budget priorities – the majority (80%) are less certain.
Highly confident in budget priorities
The proof gap in Healthcare / Life Sciences teams is modest (50% vs 64%) – both groups face similar challenges translating brand belief into measurable outcomes.
High Performers
All Others
In Healthcare / Life Sciences teams, 25% of high performers struggle to reach buyers versus 9% of all others – an unusual reversal where high performers face more challenges.
High Performers
All Others
Very high budget confidence in Healthcare / Life Sciences teams strongly separates high performers (50%) from all others (9%).
High Performers
Highly confident in budget priorities
All Others
Highly confident in budget priorities
92% of teams in this group are confident their brand creates preference among buyers, yet 57% are unable to clearly demonstrate its impact on revenue.
Confident in brand
Unable to demonstrate impact
While 87% of teams in this group are confident their ICP reflects their best-fit customers, 30% still struggle to find and reach those buyers effectively.
Only 39% of teams in this group express high confidence their budget is allocated correctly, leaving 61% less certain.
Highly confident in budget priorities
The proof gap in teams in this group is modest (50% vs 58%) – both groups face similar challenges translating brand belief into measurable outcomes.
High Performers
All Others
In teams in this group, ICP confidence is higher among high performers (100% vs 84%), but they paradoxically struggle more with reach (50% vs 26%) – an unusual pattern.
High Performers
All Others
Budget confidence in teams in this group shows an unusual pattern – 42% of all others are highly confident versus 25% of high performers, the smallest gap across industries.
High Performers
Highly confident in budget priorities
All Others
Highly confident in budget priorities
The difference between marketing that meets objectives and marketing that consistently exceeds them is not luck – it is specific, repeatable practices.
Our benchmark report reveals how the top 36% approach targeting, prove brand impact, quantify revenue contribution, and allocate budgets with confidence.
Based on data from 265+ B2B marketing leaders, you will see where capability gaps emerge, why most teams get stuck at "good enough," and what it takes to break through.
We asked 265+ B2B marketers which changes would have the greatest impact on their results. Tile size reflects the proportion selecting each priority. Use the filters to compare responses by performance tier and industry – and see how priorities shift between high-performing teams and the rest.
Stronger creative & content
Greater sales-marketing alignment
More investment in brand
Better technology / martech
Enhanced customer experience
Larger budget
Better audience data & insight
Improved measurement & attribution
Additional team capacity
External strategic support
Stronger creative & content
Better technology / martech
More investment in brand
Better audience data & insight
Greater sales-marketing alignment
Enhanced customer experience
Improved measurement & attribution
Larger budget
Additional team capacity
External strategic support
Greater sales-marketing alignment
Stronger creative & content
More investment in brand
Larger budget
Enhanced customer experience
Better technology / martech
Better audience data & insight
Improved measurement & attribution
Additional team capacity
External strategic support
Stronger creative & content
Better technology / martech
Greater sales-marketing alignment
Larger budget
More investment in brand
Better audience data & insight
Additional team capacity
Improved measurement & attribution
Enhanced customer experience
External strategic support
Stronger creative & content
Better technology / martech
Greater sales-marketing alignment
Better audience data & insight
More investment in brand
Improved measurement & attribution
Larger budget
Additional team capacity
External strategic support
Enhanced customer experience
Stronger creative & content
Better technology / martech
Greater sales-marketing alignment
Larger budget
Additional team capacity
More investment in brand
Better audience data & insight
Improved measurement & attribution
Enhanced customer experience
External strategic support
Greater sales-marketing alignment
More investment in brand
Larger budget
External strategic support
Better audience data & insight
Enhanced customer experience
Stronger creative & content
Better technology / martech
Improved measurement & attribution
Additional team capacity
More investment in brand
Stronger creative & content
Enhanced customer experience
Better audience data & insight
Greater sales-marketing alignment
Larger budget
External strategic support
Better technology / martech
Additional team capacity
Greater sales-marketing alignment
Larger budget
External strategic support
Improved measurement & attribution
More investment in brand
Better audience data & insight
Better technology / martech
Additional team capacity
Enhanced customer experience
Stronger creative & content
More investment in brand
Better technology / martech
Stronger creative & content
Enhanced customer experience
Better audience data & insight
Greater sales-marketing alignment
Larger budget
Improved measurement & attribution
Additional team capacity
External strategic support
Better technology / martech
More investment in brand
Enhanced customer experience
Better audience data & insight
Improved measurement & attribution
Stronger creative & content
Greater sales-marketing alignment
Larger budget
Additional team capacity
External strategic support
More investment in brand
Stronger creative & content
Larger budget
Greater sales-marketing alignment
Better technology / martech
Enhanced customer experience
Better audience data & insight
Additional team capacity
Improved measurement & attribution
External strategic support
Greater sales-marketing alignment
Stronger creative & content
Improved measurement & attribution
Enhanced customer experience
Better technology / martech
Larger budget
Better audience data & insight
More investment in brand
Additional team capacity
External strategic support
Larger budget
Stronger creative & content
Improved measurement & attribution
Greater sales-marketing alignment
Additional team capacity
Better audience data & insight
Enhanced customer experience
More investment in brand
Better technology / martech
External strategic support
Greater sales-marketing alignment
Stronger creative & content
Enhanced customer experience
Better technology / martech
More investment in brand
Better audience data & insight
Improved measurement & attribution
Larger budget
External strategic support
Additional team capacity
Enhanced customer experience
Additional team capacity
Larger budget
Stronger creative & content
Improved measurement & attribution
More investment in brand
Better technology / martech
External strategic support
Greater sales-marketing alignment
Better audience data & insight
Enhanced customer experience
Additional team capacity
Stronger creative & content
Improved measurement & attribution
More investment in brand
Better technology / martech
External strategic support
Larger budget
Stronger creative & content
Improved measurement & attribution
Enhanced customer experience
Additional team capacity
More investment in brand
Better technology / martech
External strategic support
Greater sales-marketing alignment
Better audience data & insight
Greater sales-marketing alignment
Enhanced customer experience
Better audience data & insight
Stronger creative & content
Improved measurement & attribution
More investment in brand
Better technology / martech
Additional team capacity
Larger budget
External strategic support
Greater sales-marketing alignment
Better technology / martech
Better audience data & insight
Stronger creative & content
Additional team capacity
Larger budget
Enhanced customer experience
Better audience data & insight
Stronger creative & content
Greater sales-marketing alignment
Improved measurement & attribution
More investment in brand
Additional team capacity
Larger budget
Better technology / martech
External strategic support